8 Steps to Charismatic Leadership
Note: This is a guest post from @Stephen, editor of Business Development in Context and a co-founder of the work.life.creativity forum. You can follow him on Twitter at @hdbb_stephen.
Defining Leadership
When we think of successful leaders we often think of businessmen and political figures that are in the news. In your own field, you can probably name a handful of men and women who are successful leaders - people with vision and the ability to communicate that vision in order to inspire others. Leadership is defined by your own personality and level of response-ability. Successful leaders are able to define their goals, persuade others to join them in achieving that goal, and lead their teams to success. But what would you say is the definition of leadership?
Leadership involves more than one person
There is no single definition of leadership. Understanding the different facets of leadership is the first step toward becoming an effective leader. Some common traits of successful and effective leaders include:
- A leader is the appointed head of a group, team or organization.
- A leader is a charismatic individual who is ableto make good decisions and inspire others to work toward a common goal.
- A leader has the power to communicate clearly and assertively.
- A leader has the ability to influence others in a positive way.
No single definition is more “right” or more important than any of the others. Leadership is defined by your own personality and level of response-ability, that is, your ability to respond to people and events in a manner that leads to a successful communication or resolution. One thing that all of the definitions have in common, however, is that successful leadership involves more than one person.
Trust makes you a leader
One cannot be a leader without a group of people following your direction and putting their trust in you. As a leader you have a responsibility to your employees, group, organization or team tolead them fairly and ethically. Having a title such as “Boss”, “Manager” or “Director” does not automatically confer upon you the abilities of a leader. To be a successful leader, you will need to constantly hone your skills by keeping up with the latest practices and by observing other successful leaders - both in your organization and in the news. You also need to have the humility to know that your own style of leadership will change as you gain experience and broaden your horizons.
Tip: Keep up on the latest leadership trends (not fads!) by reading trade publications, watching the news, and observing successful leaders in your own personal network.
The qualities of the successful leader
As we discussed above, a leader is someone who inspires, who makes decisions that affect the group in a positive way, and who can pull together a team with diverse skill sets to achieve a common goal. But if being a manager does not make one a leader, what does? Charisma is a quality that many people use to describe a successful leader, and it is often mistaken as a quality that one is born with. However, the true answer is deeper than that - and you can develop a charismatic leadership style if you develop the following fundamental skills:
- Knowledge - Know your stuff. A successful leader must know the details of the business in order to direct the team toward the organization’s goals.
- Trust - If you want something done right, train someone how to do it and put them in charge of it. Then let them go. Don’t micromanage your team. If you have trained them properly, they will do the right thing.
- Integrity - An organization will soon learn to work around a “leader” who is not trustworthy or does not keep their word.
- Decisiveness - A leader is valued for their ability to make a decision, especially in high-pressure situations. Combining Knowledge and Integrity are essential to being able to make the correct decision.
- Assertiveness - Leaders are often chosen or appointed to direct a team, group, or organization. A successful leader understands that they represent the interests of the team members as well as the macro-interests of the entire team, and that leader will stand up for the members who have put their trust in their leader.
- Optimism - Be realistic but confident. Your employees and your own leaders will lose faith and confidence in you if your attitude is pessimistic or negative. As a leader it is your job to manage less-than-perfect situations and turn them around. Figure it out and concentrate on the positive aspects.
- Results - Keep track of the solid decisions and successful outcomes that you have been responsible for. This record is something you can point to when a leadership opportunity comes your way, as well as something that you can look at to build or restore your own confidence in the tough times.
- Vision - As a leader you are expected to set goals that guide your team or organization in a specefic direction, the “preferred future”. You must be able to think broadly and make strategic actions part of your daily routine. This will help your team to grow in the right direction for success.
What is your leadership style?
What do you think? Is charisma something that you are born with - or is it a quality that you can develop? Leave a comment, start a discussion.
Related Stories
POSTED IN: guest posts, leadership

15 opinions for 8 Steps to Charismatic Leadership
CK
Sep 29, 2008 at 3:02 am
One thing that is missing is that in order to be a leader you must have followers! Being in a management positions does not qualify you to be leader.
@Stephen
Sep 29, 2008 at 5:20 am
Hi CK, you are so right! The idea behind charismatic leadership is to transform yourself from Manager to Leader by inspiring those that you manage to become your followers.
Great point, and thanks for commenting.
Brandon Watkins
Sep 29, 2008 at 6:34 am
The key to “charisma” is communication skill. Research has shown that others believe a person is charismatic when they make frequent eye contact and use their hands while speaking. As a professional communicator, what I take away from that finding is that “charismatic” individuals are excellent at non-verbal communication. A person can learn non-verbal communication, thus, “charisma” is a learnable trait.
Communication, then, ought to be among your list of “fundamental skills”. The leader that isn’t well-versed in various forms of communication is doomed.
Kevin Eikenberry
Sep 29, 2008 at 6:35 am
Phil - Nice post, and the qualities you mention are very important to leadership. I agree with you that charisma isnt somethign we are born with and so we can develop it. The two critical issues for charisma specifically though, I don’t feel you have truly captured. I believe charisma requires passion and values. When we have alignment between our values and the things we are passionate about, charisma will develop.
Hope that is a helpful thought.
Kevin :)
Corinne
Sep 29, 2008 at 7:16 am
Charisma is something you are born with but is does not follow you are a great leader. Hitler comes to mind. I can think of a few more modern ones but I think I’ll be diplomatic on this one.
CK
Sep 29, 2008 at 7:51 am
@Brandon -
It’s not all about “charisma” but the application of leadership. Remember that Ted Bundy had charisma - that doesn’t mean it was usered for good!
But what “charismatic leadership” comes to mind for me is more along the lines of JFK, Mother Teresa, and even MLK “I have a dream” speech, etc.
@Stephen
Sep 29, 2008 at 8:18 am
>>Brandon, You make an excellent point about communication being vital, in fact I would go even further and say that it is an over-arching requirement, that is, “successful leaders - people with vision and the ability to communicate that vision in order to inspire others.”
If you can’t (or won’t) learn to communicate, then the rest is meaningless.
>>Kevin, Thanks for your suggestion about “passion” and “values”, the alignment of those two IS a very powerful factor in one’s success as a leader. That discussion is likely worth a post of it’s own!
>>Corinne, yes, one can be born with charisma and use it for evil. As CK mentioned, we should focus on the positive and optimistic uses of leadership.
Thanks for the discussion!
Ben Simonton
Sep 30, 2008 at 4:56 am
Leadership can be defined rather precisely because it is defined by what followers follow, not by the characteristics of leaders. Leaders can lead in a good or bad direction and followers will follow. People are like machines in that they have certain characteristics and these characteristics dictate how they must be treated in order to maximize their output.
Leadership applies to people and entails the sending of value standard messages to people which most of them then follow/use. Thus we say that they have been “led” in the direction of those standards. Leadership is one side of the coin called values, the other side being followership.
Leadership in the workplace consists of the value standards reflected in everything an employee experiences because these standards are what employees follow by using them to perform their work. Most of what the employee experiences is the support or lack thereof provided by management - such as training, tools, parts, discipline, direction, material, procedures, rules, technical advice, documentation, information, planning, etc.
Leadership is not a process any manager can change. It happens inexorably every minute of every day because of the way people respond to management actions. The only choice available to a manager is the standard (good, bad, mediocre or in between) which he/she transmits to employees.
Because of these characteristics, “followership” turns out to be a major force in managing people. Those managers who take advantage of it can become extremely effective at “managing” their human capital.
For example, let’s look at the top-down command and control technique that is the most widely used method to manage people.
Top-down concentrates on producing goals, targets, visions, orders and other directives in order to control the workforce and thereby achieve organizational success. Focusing on giving direction prevents these managers from doing much of anything else. Thus top-down treats employees like robots in the “shut up and listen, I know better than you” mode, and rarely if ever listens to them. By so doing this approach ignores every employee’s basic need to be heard and to be respected. In addition, not listening to employees makes top management ignorant of what is really going on in the workplace thus making their directives misguided at best and irrelevant at worst.
There are many more things wrong about top-down and it results in a very low performance by the workforce, far lower than they are capable of producing. Its opposite can achieve an opposite result wherein people unleash their full potential of creativity, innovation, productivity, motivation, and commitment on their work. This after all should be the only primary goal of managing people.
I proved this to be true in my 30+ years of managing people, and that included effecting four successful turnarounds of management disasters. Of course, it took me 12 years to escape the top-down command and control approach.
To more about how to manage people, please read these Leadership Articles starting with the article “Leadership, Good or Bad”.
Best regards, Ben
Edward Brown
Sep 30, 2008 at 1:21 pm
There appears to be two dominant leadership models on the current world stage, Charismatic Leadership (often described as arousing the emotions of the populous through imagery and poetic prose) and Traditional Leadership (Often described as operations-centric and unilateral while courting consensus building). Interesting enough, both forms are effective, but only under specific social-economic conditions. During times of uncertainty and upheaval, Charismatic Leadership is effective at restoring hope and productivity. Once the crisis has abated, Traditional Leadership is effective for stabilizing operations and maintaining a steady course until another shake up emerges. The important dynamic essential for the two models to be effective is the competency of the Charismatic and Traditional Leader. The two models represent a particular philosophy as well as direction, which require scholarship and experience. The U.S.’s current tumultuous conditions favor the Charismatic Model. But, the Charismatic Model steeped with experience as much as style.
Edward Brown
Core Edge Image & Charisma Institute
Jean-Marie
Sep 30, 2008 at 4:28 pm
A lot of good things have been said in the article and the comments however I miss two things in my definition of Leadership: Being a leader is also being able to listen and being able to create a team.
Sure you can rely on trust by making one by one your team member autonomous but if you are not able to create a real team based on each individual interaction you will miss a very powerful leverage of your leadership as this group will first go for internal competition rather than adding all values two create something stronger.
If you are not able to listen and putting yourself in someone else shoes, you will generate frustration, mistrust or suspiciousness and so will lose your leadership.
Best regards, JM
@Stephen
Oct 1, 2008 at 11:02 am
Interesting points. I do agree that there are nearly as many leadership styles as there are leaders, that is one of the conundrums of teaching leadership skills.
>>JM - Creating a team (or teams) is absolutely one of the goals of being a successful leader. It has a lot to do with the size of the group or organization that one leads.
Thanks for the comments!
Ben Simonton
Oct 1, 2008 at 11:54 am
Stephen,
There are a ton of styles, but effectively managing people and leadership skills are not about style. Style is an excuse to not do what is needed. No, managing/leading effectively is about doing what the people being managed need in order to do a better job. in order to unleash their full potential of creativity, innovation, productivity, motivation and commitment on their work.
Marcus Buckingham in the employ of Gallup has done us a great service in this by surveying over 3 million workforce members and 80,000 managers. They learned the most from the workforce since a manager must understand how they react to managerial actions in order to manage them effectively. Buckingham also determined ways to measure whether or not managers were effective by surveying the workforce. This Gallup’s Q12 survey.
Although I agree somewhat with Buckingham and applaud him for his work, I believe that managerial effectiveness can best be determined by measuring what the manager does against a set of proven performance standards. By proven, I mean the ones I used and caused my subordinate managers to use in successfully turning around four different management disasters, causing each to be able to blow away competitors. The result was always the same and always far better than anyone dreamed possible.
Best regards, Ben
Мениджърски умения, подвеждащи реклами, работа и бизнес: 02.10.2008
Oct 2, 2008 at 4:29 am
[…] Осем стъпки за харизматично лидерство - дефиниция на лидерството, обяснение на ролята на доверието в процеса на лидерство и описание на осемте качества на харизматичния лидер. […]
Obama or McCain: Charismatic or Traditional Leadership
Oct 9, 2008 at 6:31 pm
[…] Brown from the Core Edge Image & Charisma Institute shared a very interesting comment on 8 Steps to Charismatic Leadership that gave me pause, and made me realize I needed to share it with you: There appears to be two […]
Choosing Integrity Over Manipulation | Slow Leadership
Nov 6, 2008 at 4:53 am
[…] 8 Steps to Charismatic Leadership […]
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: